Wednesday, 22 January 2014

To My Russian History Instructor

My prof has made the stupid mistake of showing me he doesn't know how to teach history. I've been taught so far by 2 great history professors who know their info (which this prof does) and know how to get it across without assuming you already know everything about the time period (which this prof does not) and without making encompassing generalizations (which this prof does). He makes allusions and references to events we know nothing about and have not read anything about and when we ask him he declares his surprise at the weakness of this topic in our textbook.

SO GIVE US SOMETHING TO READ WHICH WILL HELP US KNOW WHAT IS GOING ON OR TEACH IT TO US IN CLASS.

Let's not concentrate on how all his talks are way over my head not because they're so mind-blowing but because he jumps around and can't decide what to talk about. He also irked me when talking about religions of the medieval period. He said that Islam was more tolerant of Christianity and Judaism than it is now and Christianity persecuted against other religions and then the enlightenment era came and switched everything up making Christianity more tolerant and Islam less so…

This is not an argument from me on development of Christian vs. Islamic identity and ideology. Both had their very different development arcs and they are in no way parallels or mirror images of each other. This is also not me saying one is more accepting than the other RIGHT NOW. This IS me saying that acceptance was ingrained in Islam from the get go and the flawed ways of interpreting it are not characteristic of the religion but of the people who interpreted it however they liked.

If Muslim leaders chose to interpret verses incorrectly then that is the fault of the people or the leaders. This is not the fault of the religion which in its ideology from the start is not supposed to discriminate against ANY religion. It’s not just people of the book like you (Russian prof) said. Mistakes HAVE been made but they are made by people who take liberties with the religion and label their actions as “Islamic”. It’s like how specific countries are the poster-nations for Islam and people look to them as an embodiment of the whole religion. You want the religion; get it from the Qur’an and the habits of the Prophet. Islam is so much higher than this lowly butt of all jokes you make it to be.

I told him as much in an email and asked him very kindly to clarify that it is the specific leaders whose actions changed towards people of differing faiths and not a change in ideology which sparked any antagonism towards people of other religions.

I am a Muslim girl who is very willing to have conversations about other religions. I love this quote from the IB mission statement:

"The International Baccalaureate aims to develop inquiring, knowledgeable and caring young people who help to create a better and more peaceful world through intercultural understanding and respect.

To this end the organization works with schools, governments and international organizations to develop challenging programmes of international education and rigorous assessment.

These programmes encourage students across the world to become active, compassionate and lifelong learners who understand that other people, with their differences, can also be right."

It makes everything so clear. It says “I recognize you have a differing point of view. I don’t have to take it as my own point of view but I realize you have a differing stance and I try to educate myself to understand your acceptance of this stance. My truth does not have to be your truth but we both must respect each other because these are our own visions of what is right”.

Thank you for making Russian history boring and irrelevant.
Thank you for wrecking something I love.
Thank you for your incompetence.